“You will be assimilated –
resistance is futile”; so says the Borg, “old Europe” and all the like minded union
‘hired ruffians’ who believe that collectivism is the proper antidote for
Personal Responsibility, Individual Liberty and Freedom.
While at the G20 Summit,
‘Dear Leader Reader’ gleefully multi-tasks by vilifying Americans here
at home and by giving away “the store” abroad by pledging our (US) tax dollars to a confederation
of globalists, unionists, communists and despots all focused on DECLARING AN END TO FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.
Lest, we veer off into the
tall grass, when you read ‘the end to capitalism‘
you should be thinking to yourself; “the
end of private property”! And, you
should be thinking that; “this means the end
of
as we know it and as it was founded”.
As bequeath to us by our
creator, and through precedent from our common heritage with British
Mercantilism
of the 16th –19th centuries, we hold to the distinct
notion that each person owns his or her
own labor and therefore is allowed to sell the use of that labor to an employer.
Those who believe in state managed
economies do NOT believe that that you are allowed to sell the use of your
labor! Instead your labor belongs to the state and should be directed toward
the state’s purpose rather than your own purpose.
While there are many places
in the world where you can live in a state managed economy, the idea that some
one else owns YOUR LABOR has been antithetical to our founding, our
constitution, and the very freedoms granted by our Creator.
So in case you think, that
the conversion of American from capitalism to socialism and the giant welfare
state won’t affect you think again:
Socialism is evil
Walter E. Williams
July 28, 2004
What is socialism? We miss the boat if we say it’s the agenda of left-wingers and Democrats. According to Marxist doctrine, socialism is a stage of society between capitalism and communism where private ownership and control over property are eliminated. The essence of socialism is the attenuation and ultimate abolition of private property rights. Attacks on private property include, but are not limited to, confiscating the rightful property of one person and giving it to another to whom it doesn’t belong. When this is done privately, we call it theft. When it’s done collectively, we use euphemisms: income transfers or redistribution. It’s not just left-wingers and Democrats who call for and admire socialism but right-wingers and Republicans as well.
Republicans and right-wingers support taking the earnings of one American and giving them to farmers, banks, airlines and other failing businesses. Democrats and left-wingers support taking the earnings of one American and giving them to poor people, cities and artists. Both agree on taking one American’s earnings to give to another; they simply differ on the recipients. This kind of congressional activity constitutes at least two-thirds of the federal budget.
Regardless of the purpose, such behavior is immoral. It’s a reduced form of slavery. After all, what is the essence of slavery? It’s the forceful use of one person to serve the purposes of another person. When Congress, through the tax code, takes the earnings of one person and turns around to give it to another person in the forms of prescription drugs, Social Security, food stamps, farm subsidies or airline bailouts, it is forcibly using one person to serve the purposes of another.
The moral question stands out in starker relief when we acknowledge that those spending programs coming out of Congress do not represent lawmakers reaching into their own pockets and sending out the money. Moreover, there’s no tooth fairy or Santa Claus giving them the money. The fact that government has no resources of its very own forces us to acknowledge that the only way government can give one American a dollar is to first — through intimidation, threats and coercion — take that dollar from some other American.
Some might rejoin that all of this is a result of a democratic process and it’s legal. Legality alone is no guide for a moral people. There are many things in this world that have been, or are, legal but clearly immoral. Slavery was legal. Did that make it moral? South Africa’s apartheid, Nazi persecution of Jews, and Stalinist and Maoist purges were all legal, but did that make them moral?
Can a moral case be made for taking the rightful property of one American and giving it to another to whom it does not belong? I think not. That’s why socialism is evil. It uses evil means (coercion) to achieve what are seen as good ends (helping people). We might also note that an act that is inherently evil does not become moral simply because there’s a majority consensus.
An argument against legalized theft should not be construed as an argument against helping one’s fellow man in need. Charity is a noble instinct; theft, legal or illegal, is despicable. Or, put another way: Reaching into one’s own pocket to assist his fellow man is noble and worthy of praise. Reaching into another person’s pocket to assist one’s fellow man is despicable and worthy of condemnation.
For the Christians among us, socialism and the welfare state must be seen as sinful. When God gave Moses the commandment “Thou shalt not steal,” I’m sure He didn’t mean thou shalt not steal unless there’s a majority vote. And I’m sure that if you asked God if it’s OK just being a recipient of stolen property, He would deem that a sin as well.
©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
republished from:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1252930/posts